News

Boris Johnson condemned for lying to parliament

Boris Johnson, Britain’s former prime minister, has been condemned for lying to parliament over the Covid “partygate” scandal, in a damning report that casts doubt on whether he can ever stage a political comeback.

The report by a cross-party committee of MPs published on Thursday is a searing indictment of Johnson’s conduct in high office, finding him to have committed multiple contempts of parliament.

The panel said that if Johnson had not already quit as an MP, he should have been suspended from the House of Commons for 90 days for “repeated contempts and seeking to undermine the parliamentary process”.

In a further blow to Johnson, the Commons privileges committee also recommended that he should “not be granted a former member’s pass” — restricting his access to the parliamentary estate.

The report by MPs found that he deliberately misled the Commons, deliberately lied to the privileges committee, breached confidence, impugned the panel and was complicit in a “campaign of abuse and attempted intimidation of the committee”.

Johnson quit as an MP last Friday after receiving an advance copy of the report by the committee, claiming he was the victim of a “political hit job” by a “kangaroo court”.

Johnson jumped before being pushed: if he had remained an MP, the account of deceit and misconduct contained in the 108-page report would have almost certainly resulted in him being ousted from parliament.

The privileges committee’s report will be considered by all MPs next week. If the Commons endorses its findings that he deliberately misled parliament, it will represent an ignominious coda to Johnson’s premiership.

Johnson on Friday lashed out at the committee, claiming he was the victim of a “vendetta” and that the report was “intended to be the final knife-thrust in a protracted political assassination”.

He said that the committee’s assertion that he deliberately lied to parliament was “deranged”, adding: “This is rubbish. It is a lie.” He said all the events referred to in the report were lawful.

The seven-member committee recommended that Johnson — if he had still been an MP — should be suspended from the Commons for 90 days. Johnson’s constituents in Uxbridge and South Ruislip could then have moved a recall petition, triggering a parliamentary by-election.

Johnson, prime minister from July 2019 until September 2022 and a former mayor of London, was one of Britain’s most controversial leaders in recent times and the most powerful advocate of the Brexit cause.

He took the UK out of the EU in January 2020 but his premiership was immediately engulfed in the coronavirus crisis. The pandemic almost claimed Johnson’s life, but his conduct afterwards was to prove his downfall.

A series of parties were held in Downing Street and Whitehall — Johnson was himself fined by police for breaking Covid lockdown regulations — but the former premier repeatedly denied to MPs that any rules had been broken.

The privileges committee, chaired by veteran Labour MP Harriet Harman, concluded that Johnson knew very well Covid rules had been broken — hearing evidence from multiple officials who worked in Downing Street at the time — and that he deliberately misled MPs.

“This inquiry goes to the very heart of our democracy,” said the MPs. “Misleading the House is not a technical issue, but a matter of great importance.”

Lying in parliament is deemed to be a contempt and would normally signal the end of a political career, but Johnson has shown in the past he plays by different rules.

He has said he has left parliament “for now”, leaving open the possibility of a return at next year’s general election.

He and his allies hope that Tory party members will agree that Johnson is the victim of an establishment stitch-up, echoing the tactics of former US president Donald Trump.

Many Tory MPs have already said that Rishi Sunak, prime minister, should block Johnson from the party’s parliamentary candidates list.

But Johnson made it clear on Thursday he would not be going quietly. “This report is a charade,” he said. “I was wrong to believe in the committee or its good faith. The terrible truth is that it is not I who has twisted the truth. It is Harriet Harman and her committee.”

Articles You May Like

Starmer declines to rule out changes to council tax or pensions tax relief
US banking heir gave Trump campaign fund $50mn after ex-president’s conviction
Conservative ‘underdogs’ can still win, says Shapps
French leftists move to shore up alliance ahead of snap elections
‘Insane’ pay rises for junior London lawyers raise concerns over culture