News

Mirror accused of ordering ‘unlawful activities’, High Court hears

The publishers of the Mirror newspaper carried out “unlawful activities” on an “industrial scale”, it was claimed in London’s High Court on Wednesday at the start of a lawsuit brought by Prince Harry and three other celebrities alleging phone hacking by the media group.

David Sherborne, the barrister representing Prince Harry, said senior executives at the media group including Piers Morgan, then editor of the Daily Mirror, had known about the use of illegal information-gathering methods.

Sherborne claimed the group “left morality at the door” and illegal acts “were carried out on an industrial scale over a period of about 20 years”.

The High Court heard that the media group, which is defending the case, had apologised to Prince Harry for using a private investigator to target him at a London nightclub in 2004.

Mirror Group Newspapers said in written arguments that there was a payment record of £75 from The People to a private investigator in February 2004 relating to “enquiries made regarding Harry at Chinawhite”. 

“It is admitted that this represented an instruction to engage in UIG [unlawful information gathering], and MGN unreservedly apologises and accepts that the DOS [Duke of Sussex] is entitled to appropriate compensation for it,” said Andrew Green KC, the barrister representing Mirror Group.

Sherborne told the High Court that the four claimants would show the breadth of the Mirror Group’s unlawful activity.

One claimant, Coronation Street soap actor Nikki Sanderson, was targeted by a private investigator instructed by the media group when she was just 15, the court heard.

The barrister said £9.7mn was spent by Mirror Group on private investigators between 1996 and 2011.

“This demonstrates that the TM [Trinity Mirror] Board (which was aggressively seeking to cut costs and save money during this period) must have been aware of these activities, which were recognised as unlawful by senior members of MGN and TM management,” Sherborne claimed in written arguments.

Mirror Group argued the lawsuits have been brought too late and said the board and executives knew nothing about such unlawful activities.

Green said the group “maintains that claimants cannot now recover compensation for any injury caused by publication of the articles in respect of which their claims are time-barred”.

He added: “There is no evidence, or no sufficient evidence, of voicemail interception in any of these four claims. That central allegation is therefore denied in each of the claims.”

The hearing is the second civil trial on phone hacking faced by Mirror Group. The company paid out £1.2mn in damages after a civil trial in 2015 to eight victims of phone hacking by journalists.

Along with Prince Harry, the other three claimants are Sanderson, Coronation Street actor Michael Turner and Fiona Wightman, former wife of the comedian Paul Whitehouse.

Articles You May Like

How to Use Price Action in Trends
Market Keeps Going & Going – Swing Trading Ideas by the Charts (Members Preview)
Top 3 Technical Analysis Indicators You Should Use for Better Entries and Exits
Is Commercial Metals (CMC) A ‘Buy’ Ahead of Fiscal Q3 Earnings Announcement?
Five Things to Look For With Any Economic Release